<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for bajaj.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bajaj.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bajaj.com</link>
	<description>Bajaj Family</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Love and Care by Dolly</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/thoughts/love-and-care/comment-page-1#comment-541</link>
		<dc:creator>Dolly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=82#comment-541</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Happened to come across your blog unintently, while searching for something else. Would like you to understand that whatever you wrote about what a man likes holds true for women too. Woman likes a man, &quot;who respects and appreciates them, cares and cooks for them, makes them feel important and on occasion assumes the traditional role of a man, such as paying for a meal or initiating intimacy.&quot;

Regards,

Dolly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Happened to come across your blog unintently, while searching for something else. Would like you to understand that whatever you wrote about what a man likes holds true for women too. Woman likes a man, &#8220;who respects and appreciates them, cares and cooks for them, makes them feel important and on occasion assumes the traditional role of a man, such as paying for a meal or initiating intimacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Dolly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2008 Fall Show and Sale by navien</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/news/2008-fall-show-and-sale/comment-page-1#comment-457</link>
		<dc:creator>navien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 12:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=59#comment-457</guid>
		<description>it is superb i congratulate ur innorvation my wishes to achieve great heights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is superb i congratulate ur innorvation my wishes to achieve great heights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mac vs PC by Deodatta</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/stories/mac-vs-pc/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Deodatta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=55#comment-444</guid>
		<description>The comparison of Mac and PC is good and thoughtful. Whenever possible I too compare products considering many aspects. In March I bought an (Intel based) iMac. I am enjoying. But I admit that even though I tried hard, I had not succeeded in making a thorough technical comparison w.r.t software and hardware. I just had the hunch that a 64-bit machine from Apple with great display and unix type platform would be just fine for me even though I hardly worked with unix earlier. Again I must admit, I had this assurance that WinXP could be installed on this machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comparison of Mac and PC is good and thoughtful. Whenever possible I too compare products considering many aspects. In March I bought an (Intel based) iMac. I am enjoying. But I admit that even though I tried hard, I had not succeeded in making a thorough technical comparison w.r.t software and hardware. I just had the hunch that a 64-bit machine from Apple with great display and unix type platform would be just fine for me even though I hardly worked with unix earlier. Again I must admit, I had this assurance that WinXP could be installed on this machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netbook vs Smartphone by Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/stories/netbook-vs-smartphone/comment-page-1#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=71#comment-437</guid>
		<description>&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;I compared scenarios of carrying a netbook versus a smartphone as an ultra portable computer, neither being one’s primary computer. I started out by defining the typical hardware and usage of a netbook. While it could run almost any operating system, it is still limited in screen, keyboard and possibly solid state disk size, thereby being comparable in hardware and capabilities to a smartphone and not a notebook computer.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;I agree that a notebook computer would not be comparable to a smartphone as each one serves a very different purpose. If certain manufacturers have designed crossover netbooks that in effect are notebooks, I am not referring to those heavier, less portable computers, as I am comparing devices similar in portability and capability.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The greatest benefit of a smartphone I highlighted is that it is always with you and available even if one did not plan to carry a netbook. The reasons for one having to plan to carry a netbook and the decision not being automatic are dimensions, weight and need. A netbook does not fit in one’s pocket. Most people need to carry a phone and do not hesitate to for reasons of dimensions or weight. More often than not, having such a device is more important than its capabilities. Something is better than nothing. Smartphones are getting increasingly capable, and in my example the iPhone does better than a netbook for the limited purposes a netbook is designed for by definition and practicality.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">I compared scenarios of carrying a netbook versus a smartphone as an ultra portable computer, neither being one’s primary computer. I started out by defining the typical hardware and usage of a netbook. While it could run almost any operating system, it is still limited in screen, keyboard and possibly solid state disk size, thereby being comparable in hardware and capabilities to a smartphone and not a notebook computer.</p>
<p align="justify">I agree that a notebook computer would not be comparable to a smartphone as each one serves a very different purpose. If certain manufacturers have designed crossover netbooks that in effect are notebooks, I am not referring to those heavier, less portable computers, as I am comparing devices similar in portability and capability.</p>
<p align="justify">The greatest benefit of a smartphone I highlighted is that it is always with you and available even if one did not plan to carry a netbook. The reasons for one having to plan to carry a netbook and the decision not being automatic are dimensions, weight and need. A netbook does not fit in one’s pocket. Most people need to carry a phone and do not hesitate to for reasons of dimensions or weight. More often than not, having such a device is more important than its capabilities. Something is better than nothing. Smartphones are getting increasingly capable, and in my example the iPhone does better than a netbook for the limited purposes a netbook is designed for by definition and practicality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Netbook vs Smartphone by Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/stories/netbook-vs-smartphone/comment-page-1#comment-436</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 14:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=71#comment-436</guid>
		<description>A netbook is not meant to replace your phone.  They have different usage scenarios.  Would you rely on your phone to take all your phone calls? That would look pretty strange, walking around with a netbook while talking into it.

Netbooks like phones are companion PCs.  Different primary uses.  Start looking at them through the relationship they have to your main pc, that&#039;s where we&#039;ll see some interesting conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A netbook is not meant to replace your phone.  They have different usage scenarios.  Would you rely on your phone to take all your phone calls? That would look pretty strange, walking around with a netbook while talking into it.</p>
<p>Netbooks like phones are companion PCs.  Different primary uses.  Start looking at them through the relationship they have to your main pc, that&#8217;s where we&#8217;ll see some interesting conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhone in Canada by Sat</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/news/iphone-in-canada/comment-page-1#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Sat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=48#comment-415</guid>
		<description>To anyone who reads this, The cost may sound shocking,but it is actually worth it. once you get one, it is actually hard to live without. I suggest to get one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To anyone who reads this, The cost may sound shocking,but it is actually worth it. once you get one, it is actually hard to live without. I suggest to get one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuclear Power Plants by Sat</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/news/nuclear-power-plants/comment-page-1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Sat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=66#comment-407</guid>
		<description>I also suggest to switch to nuclear power for the time being. Though it is not the best, it is better than coal or oil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also suggest to switch to nuclear power for the time being. Though it is not the best, it is better than coal or oil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Internet Movie Rentals &#8211; Part 1 by Suraj Yadav</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/thoughts/internet-movie-rentals/comment-page-1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Suraj Yadav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?p=61#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I dont buy your argument of not using the internet to watch movies or other leisure purposes. you were right on stating that we don&#039;t need to conserve the internet bandwidth as its not going to run out but then going to certain extent to compare the current internet scenario with the old time is neither justifiable nor reasonable. Internet is not only just for researching papers or doing banking transaction. its the same way saying people should use phone only to make emergency calls or making important calls only rather than talking to others for leisure and forwarding sms. Internet is a service and companies are providing those services because there is demand for that. there is a business model to encourage the customers to use these services. if you are talking about environmental cost for consumption of more electricity or installing more infrastructure to support these heavy usage of bandwidth then I think it is more environment friendly for people to use internet to download movies rather than taking their car out and burning car and wear and tear of machinery to rent the movies and even then what about the cost to manufacture the disk or cost and environmental impact of opening a brick and mortar shop. Bandwidth is intangible and does not add much excess cost to existing cost but your suggestion is all tangible cost and has more impact on environment and resources than what it will be on consuming more bandwidth. Going by your analogy, you are recommending people to read paper newspaper rather than electronic papers online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont buy your argument of not using the internet to watch movies or other leisure purposes. you were right on stating that we don&#8217;t need to conserve the internet bandwidth as its not going to run out but then going to certain extent to compare the current internet scenario with the old time is neither justifiable nor reasonable. Internet is not only just for researching papers or doing banking transaction. its the same way saying people should use phone only to make emergency calls or making important calls only rather than talking to others for leisure and forwarding sms. Internet is a service and companies are providing those services because there is demand for that. there is a business model to encourage the customers to use these services. if you are talking about environmental cost for consumption of more electricity or installing more infrastructure to support these heavy usage of bandwidth then I think it is more environment friendly for people to use internet to download movies rather than taking their car out and burning car and wear and tear of machinery to rent the movies and even then what about the cost to manufacture the disk or cost and environmental impact of opening a brick and mortar shop. Bandwidth is intangible and does not add much excess cost to existing cost but your suggestion is all tangible cost and has more impact on environment and resources than what it will be on consuming more bandwidth. Going by your analogy, you are recommending people to read paper newspaper rather than electronic papers online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Art by RAKESH BAJAJ</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/about/sue/art/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>RAKESH BAJAJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?page_id=34#comment-111</guid>
		<description>ur painting is awesome it shows ur positivity about life. pls show more painting here i will be thankful to u. mumbai mein bolu to mast hai with regarda             rakesh bajaj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ur painting is awesome it shows ur positivity about life. pls show more painting here i will be thankful to u. mumbai mein bolu to mast hai with regarda             rakesh bajaj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Art by Komal</title>
		<link>http://www.bajaj.com/about/sue/art/comment-page-1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Komal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bajaj.com/?page_id=34#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Nani, this is sooooo amazing.Congratulations :) People struggle to get their art sold for years and look at you go..
the painting is simply beautiful.

Love -Komal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nani, this is sooooo amazing.Congratulations <img src='http://www.bajaj.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  People struggle to get their art sold for years and look at you go..<br />
the painting is simply beautiful.</p>
<p>Love -Komal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
